Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:05:04 -0500 From: "Troy Settle" <troy@psknet.com> To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: tpop3d experience ? Message-ID: <E1B6mKn-0000Zk-HR@psknet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040325085734.A34287@crosswinds.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tony Holmes > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 8:58 AM > To: Simon Dick > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: tpop3d experience ? > > On +Mar 25, Simon Dick wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:54, Andy Dills wrote: > > > > > > For what it's worth, qmail's pop3d is also pretty solid. > Very small, very > > > lightweight, and you get to write your own password > authentication if you > > > want. > > > > > > For an MTA however, I don't use qmail, I use postfix (but > with maildir). > > > > > > Although, this thread has convinced me to try out > tpop3d...I'll definitely > > > give it a look. > > > > Give teapop a look too, I find that works very well too > > I'll chime in with my vote for teapop as well. I've been > using it for a > couple years now with postfix in mbox/maildir in > passwd/mysql/pgsql auth > modes. I've had no operational issues or failures in my time in using > it. *knock on wood* > FWIW, I've been using Exim w/Maildir delivery and the Courier-IMAP package for both POP3 and IMAP support. I have the SqWebMail package set up to use the same auth daemon, but I provide Squirrelmail for primary web access to their mailboxes. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 866.477.5638
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1B6mKn-0000Zk-HR>