Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 02:31:01 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE nice behavior fixed. Message-ID: <20030403022937.J64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20030403072409.GA1429@kevad.internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:35:59PM -0500, Jeff Roberson > <jroberson@chesapeake.net> wrote: > > > Do you know of any problem other than idlepri breakage? I just fixed > > that. I'm about to get on a plane so I don't have time to benchmark it. > > If you have a chance I'd love to see how the most recent fixes effect your > > buildworld time. > > > > I still have to microoptimize the code a bit to get rid of switch > > statements etc, but it all works. > > Interactivity is still worse under ULE. It's quite noticeable and I > tested it on two SMP boxes by running two simple loops in kind of: > for ((;;)); do let $((4+4)); done # this is bash specific > > The loops ran under nice +20. Typing in the xterm is jerky, > characters will not show up immediately, but in small "bursts". I > mean that about three characters typed in will show up immediately, > then small pause happens and a burst of characters (which queued up > in the pause) will show up. This is annoying. Starting up xterm > takes more time as well, but I can live with that. > -- This is strange, I am not seeing any of this behavior. What is the version of your sched_ule.c? I made more changes very recently. Thanks, Jeff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030403022937.J64602-100000>