Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:37:24 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 tcp.4 Message-ID: <20040711103724.GA42847@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <200407101755.i6AHtEJO033987@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200407101755.i6AHtEJO033987@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:55:13PM +0000, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > maxim 2004-07-10 17:55:13 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > share/man/man4 tcp.4 > Log: > o Document net.inet.sack.enable sysctl. net.inet.sack.sackhole_limit > is not documented yet, it is not used at the moment and is the subject > of the future work. > > Improved by: ru > Not objected: ps, jayanth Hmm, is renaming of ``net.inet.tcp.sack.sackhole_limit'' to ``net.inet.tcp.sack.maxholes'' is still considered by interested parties as was proposed by Dag-Erling back at June 24th? ./danfe P.S. There seem to be vast inconsistencies with ``*limit'' sysctl names WRT using underscore, i.e.: net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit but net.inet.sack.sackhole_limit kern.ps_arg_cache_limit Should we come to some agreement on this issue?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040711103724.GA42847>