Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 14:40:49 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.0-970124-SNAP: man page search order Message-ID: <199702092140.OAA06585@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970209121157.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <Mutt.19970208234401.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <9632.855479839@critter.dk.tfs.com> <Mutt.19970209121157.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> static char *std_sections[] =
> {
> "1", "n", "l", "6", "8", "2", "3", "4", "5", "7", "9", "p", "o", NULL
> };
>
> (It can be overridden by a MANSEC variable, btw.)
>
> Now comes the difficult part: what's the best order?
>
> static char *std_sections[] =
> {
> "1", "8", "2", "3", "n", "4", "5", "6", "7", "9", "l", NULL
> };
This works for me. But, it leans toward programmer/admin types, which
some may disagree with. My gut feeling is 'commit that puppy'. :)
Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702092140.OAA06585>