Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:34:42 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks Message-ID: <4E6DFC62.9080405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201109120826.36804.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4E6DB696.1080608@FreeBSD.org> <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org> <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org> <201109120826.36804.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 12/09/2011 15:26 John Baldwin said the following: > On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> I think the patch is >>> fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing >>> nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well. >> >> I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion. >> My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to >> get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0. What do you think? > > I think this is fine. > Another thing that was suggested to me via private communication is to change -Os to -O1 for those "non-constrained" boot blocks. I do not see anything wrong with that. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6DFC62.9080405>