Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:33:15 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> Cc: Bob Van Valzah <Bob@Talarian.Com>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jorge Aldana <jorge@salk.edu>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, <smp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Performance vs. Stable Message-ID: <20020228143126.P51203-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020227121320.X8086-100000@gateway.posi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Kelly Yancey wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > > > > Processor, Processes - factor slower than the best > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > I think you are misinterpreting them. The non-starrd results are > > absolute times. E.g., they say that the "null" syscall takes 6.1 usec > > in 4.5-S and 6.1 usec in -current. This is about right. The "null" > > ... > > I know I am going out on a limb to doubt you, but are you sure? The chart No. I just didn't believe the results, and conveniently forgot the details of their annotation. See the followup for corrected results. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020228143126.P51203-100000>