Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 19:31:45 -0500 From: Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone? Message-ID: <52A26C71.4080308@ohlste.in> In-Reply-To: <20131206143944.4873391d@suse3> References: <529D9CC5.8060709@rancid.berkeley.edu> <20131204095855.GY29825@droso.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312041212000.2022@badger.tharned.org> <E915D8A5-1CD0-465B-BAD1-59C45C9415F4@gid.co.uk> <20131205193815.05de3829de9e33197fe210ac@getmail.no> <20131206143944.4873391d@suse3>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/6/13, 8:39 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > >> 2) that this mess around FreeBSD 10 will not slow the >> adoption rate of FreeBSD 10. > > > I don't think so. > Only a fraction of my servers ever needed BIND. > And where we need it, we're happy to install a port of it (which has a > lot of OPTIONS, which I saw for the first time only recently...) I disagree. I only run BIND on a few servers. None are exclusively nameservers. The hassle involved in properly setting up the chroot(8) would be a definite negative for me if I were considering a switch from GNU/Linux where most distros set it up that way "out of the box". That would be a definite "con" on my list of "pros and cons" especially if I read this thread. -- Jim Ohlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52A26C71.4080308>