Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:42:49 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: JAroslav Suchanek <jarda@grisoft.cz> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: shmget regression? Message-ID: <20061130224249.GA61942@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061130164220.GA1603@jardas.grisoft.cz> References: <20061130131143.GA31809@jardas.grisoft.cz> <20061130134403.P41812@fledge.watson.org> <20061130164220.GA1603@jardas.grisoft.cz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:42:20PM +0100, JAroslav Suchanek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:45:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, JAroslav Suchanek wrote: > > > > > I've tried to post PR, but it seems it got lost somewhere. > > > > > > I just wonder whether there was some change in shmget behavior in > > > current. > > > > > > Look at this patch to src/sys-cur/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c > > > > Can you send the output of 'ipcs' after the below code runs so that I can > > see the mode it ended up being created with? You might try reverting the > > priv(9) change to sysv_ipc.c and see if that fixes thanks? > > Yop, the revert helped, I've used CVS revision 1.27.4.1 of the sysv_ipc.c. Hmm, I've been having a lot of sysv ipc-related port errors on 7.x system lately, but I hadn't investigated. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFb15pWry0BWjoQKURAteAAKCqk/OI3glx2y51oEQuyzxu0J4isgCgmUQw xhPVlswJQJ6mzsEFA4drdOQ= =DLP9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061130224249.GA61942>