Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 17:01:19 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Ports FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4 Message-ID: <4FA6923F.5000408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20120506141526.GM17325@azathoth.lan> References: <4FA66EF0.7090306@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20120506135256.GL17325@azathoth.lan> <20120506141526.GM17325@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0309F66D81E7ACEB0FA19B5C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD >>> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1,= I >>> tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different box= es, >>> all failing compiling the same way, see >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D167641. >>> >>> I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be= >>> downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on= >>> either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT? >>> >>> Thank you very much for the patience, >>> >>> O. Hartmann >>> >> >> LibreOffice fix on current normally (2 days ago) >> >> For binary packages I think currently there none >=20 > Precision: do not try to build libreoffice with gcc it is know to be bu= ggy, note > that if WITH_GCC is defined in you make.conf then building libreoffice = will fail > because there is an "hidden" option WITH_GCC to allow people willing to= fix > build with gcc to do it. I do not understand. I tried all options. My systems' OSes are usually build with CLANG. USE_GCC=3D 4.6+ in cases where CLANG is known to be buggy or incapable (i.e. due to OpenMP) and setting CC, CXX and CPP for legacy gcc 4.2.1. How can it be that LibreOffice is broken with any GCC when CLANG is not the officiel compiler yet? I have a portion in /etc/make.conf on all boxes (both CURRENT and STABLE) looking like this: # editors/libreoffice =2Eif ${.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice*} #USE_GCC=3D 4.6+ #CC=3D cc #CXX=3D c++ #CPP=3D cpp DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=3D YES WITH_WEBDAV=3D true WITHOUT_KDE4=3D true WITHOUT_GTK=3D true WITHOUT_GTK3=3D true WITHOUT_GNOME=3D true WITH_JAVA=3D true WITHOUT_SYSTRAY=3D true WITH_MMEDIA=3D true WITH_SDK=3D true WITH_SVG=3D true WITHOUT_DEBUG=3D true =2Eendif It seems, even if set "DISBALE_MAKE_JOBS=3DYES" globally makes editors/libreoffice direspect this. >=20 > so first do not forget to remove it if you have it Sorry, what to remove first? I do not have GCC set in the portion for building LibreOffice. >=20 > Sorry not being able to be more helpful Thank you very much anyway. Regards, Oliver >=20 > regards, > Bapt >=20 >=20 --------------enig0309F66D81E7ACEB0FA19B5C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPppJGAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8Cn8H/3Hud3jpcs2qPHlArfPTDqkq F/L0n8W2VWaZlLn6hl3R154PE20eIb+yjsv3xzR20zV9O2q9UQn7hxjpDDbKZw65 WhGfCxTNj8G+Man/dLkXRYpGk1m1diDZuXj8fd7HKtlBBsHscOqVctr6A+OeegmL +OYPF1Ky3TZlL7y5cPv2Acbgdgby6fnXGGniFwzKxDgW6JhkwBXQZ/UgbPJliRhU Udi/z0Drtwo1Mw7J1MwNS0LAHT9c9u1MB43U8sQey2TBkaCB52HoxMu5+JURnaxT e3s6E5dHgtHqk4MW9N1+GueA7gw8K7nNmvPpcZH1okF/ios3wK28PXOucmhp98Q= =9Zea -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0309F66D81E7ACEB0FA19B5C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FA6923F.5000408>