Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:51:34 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpa Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libassuan Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/security/opensc Makefile Message-ID: <4D139A36.1080208@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik7O8aB-4ehj21NsSc0w6TAjm%2BLP4a5LOkEOqoY@mail.gmail.com> References: <201012221916.oBMJGCMY069579@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTik7O8aB-4ehj21NsSc0w6TAjm%2BLP4a5LOkEOqoY@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/23/2010 10:41, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Whoa, it's strange for 2.0.0 to 2.0.1. There is no ABI change from > what I can tell, right? I am pretty sure about that if you do my > suggest like in other thread and it will bring back to .so.0. On a philosophical basis I don't think it's a good idea to make gratuitous changes to vendor's stuff, even if arguably their own change was gratuitous. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D139A36.1080208>