Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:29:53 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Can I expect INVARIANTS and VINUM to play well together?
Message-ID:  <20001122092953.V71779@echunga.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <14874.36116.48095.108547@trooper.velocet.net>; from dgilbert@velocet.ca on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 09:56:20AM -0500
References:  <14873.24814.809777.555306@trooper.velocet.net> <20001121113903.C71779@echunga.lemis.com> <14874.36116.48095.108547@trooper.velocet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 21 November 2000 at  9:56:20 -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
>> "Greg" == Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> writes:
>
> Greg> In any case, Vinum was developed with INVARIANTS and
> Greg> INVARIANT_SUPPORT, so I doubt this is your problem.  If you do
> Greg> have problems, of course, you should tell me about them.  I note
> Greg> that you've had problems with Vinum in the past, but this is the
> Greg> first time you mention INVARIANTS.
>
> Hmmm... memory's vague now.  May have been a kernel with invariant
> support and vinum's module without.

Hmm.  I don't know whether that would cause the problem, but it's
possible.

> Would the new build scripts help this: where modules are rebuilt
> with the kernel?

Yes.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001122092953.V71779>