Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jan 2002 05:10:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr>
To:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: docs/33043: Minor changes to Chapter 3 of the handbook.
Message-ID:  <200201061310.g06DA2V12308@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/33043; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr>
To: Ashley Penney <ashp@unloved.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/33043: Minor changes to Chapter 3 of the handbook.
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 03:19:08 +0200

 On 2001-12-20 17:07:21, Ashley Penney wrote:
 > 
 > I felt the documentation in 3.4.1 for the fstab fields wasn't as
 > complete towards the end as it should be, two entries were rolled
 > into one.
 
 > >Fix:
 > --- chapter.sgml.old    Thu Dec 20 20:00:39 2001
 > +++ chapter.sgml        Thu Dec 20 20:06:14 2001
 > @@ -535,10 +535,19 @@
 >         <varlistentry>
 >           <term><literal>dumpfreq</literal></term>
 > 
 > -         <listitem><para>The number of days the filesystem should be
 > -             dumped, and <literal>passno</literal> is the pass number
 > -             during which the filesystem is checked during the boot
 > -             sequence.</para>
 > +         <listitem><para>This is used by dump to determine which
 > +             filesystems require dumping.  If the field is missing,
 > +             a value of zero is assumed.</para>
 > +         </listitem>
 > +       </varlistentry>
 > +
 > +       <varlistentry>
 > +         <term><literal>passno</literal></term>
 > +
 > +         <listitem><para>This determines the order in which filesystems
 > +             should be checked.  The root filesystem should be set to one,
 > +             other filesystems to two, and filesystems that should be
 > +             skipped set to zero.
 
 I am still catching up with my mail, so if this has already been
 committed please pardon me.
 
 Ashley, this looks nice.
 
 Do you think we could add a bit to passno's description that would
 explain why the ``magical'' values of 1 and 2 should be used?  Perhaps
 something like:
 
         <listitem>
 	  <para>This determines the order in which filesystems should
 	    be checked.  Filesystems that should be skipped should
 	    have their <literal>passno</literal> set to zero.  The
 	    root filesystem (which needs to be checked before
 	    everything else) should have it's
 	    <literal>passno</literal> set to one, and other
 	    filesystems' <literal>passno</literal> should be set to
 	    values greater than one.  If more than one filesystems
 	    have the same <literal>passno</literal> then &man.fsck.8;
 	    will attempt to check filesystems in parallel if
 	    possible.</para>
 	  </listitem>
 
 Does this look any better, Ashley?
 Other suggestions anyone?
 
 -giorgos
 
 PS: I know that the manpage of fstab(5) uses the ``magical'' values of
     1 and 2 too.  A quick glance to the src/sbin/fsck sources and I
     see that there is nothing magical about 2.  Perhaps we should also
     change fstab.5 to read "greater than one" instead of 2.
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201061310.g06DA2V12308>