Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 23:50:59 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Marking deGianted functions ? Message-ID: <7119.1021845059@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Do we have a convention for marking functions which have been deGianted() ? If not, could we make some kind of comment convention so people can determine the liberated parts ? as more and more parts of the kernel gets out from under giant this becomes more and more of an issue. I realize that marking the non-safe entrypoints is the "logical" thing to do, but probably less practical, or ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7119.1021845059>