Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:31:40 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem building modules for release. Message-ID: <20000615093140.L18462@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20000615090242.A32679@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:02:42AM -0700 References: <20000615090242.A32679@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> [000615 09:03] wrote: > As some may know, modules are not winding up in the `bin' distribution in > release builds right now. The problem is one may decided they don't want > to build modules when they build their kernel, but they cannot decide to > do the traditional way of building modules with the world. > I am putting back that ability. > > Now that we've had a taste of both ways, I have two questions of people: > > 1. Should the symbol be MODULES_WITH_KERNEL or MODULES_WITH_WORLD, (or > something else)? > > 2. Which should be the default? Building modules with world or kernel. I haven't see an "oops my modules and kernel are out of sync" mail since the change. The extra time it takes to build is a bit annoying but very worth the protection it allows. I'd stick with building the modules along with the kernel. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000615093140.L18462>