Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:48:59 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc tree state? Message-ID: <20040929144859.3e932576@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040929224017.K11164@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <20040929222559.T11104@mp2.macomnet.net> <20040929143825.6774d946@localhost> <20040929224017.K11164@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:45:29 +0400 (MSD) Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 14:38-0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:27:56 +0400 (MSD) > > Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> wrote: > > > > Maxim my old friend, hope you are well. > > > > > Please excuse my ignorance but what is the current state of the doc > > > tree? Is it allowed to commit there? TIA. > > > > We have a doc "slush" where new content is "carefully introduced" > > at the "discretion" of the person committing the change. This is > > to help keep translators from getting too far behind the English > > version. Of course, if you were to ask me what 'defines' good > > and bad commits during these times, I'd look at you blankly. > > Just a couple of patches for our mirrors list. It it OK to commit > them? These look correct at just an eye glance, if you can run make and get no errors then please commit. :) -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040929144859.3e932576>