Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:27 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net> To: eculp@bafirst.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS Message-ID: <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com> <44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> <44F37063.6010302@elischer.org> <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
eculp@bafirst.com (eculp) writes: > > I assume that you have seen the following: > > http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views That is definitely the right way to do it imho. > I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try > especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and > ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family. djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC. Philhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829075727.GD20989>