Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 05:08:35 -0800 (PST) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: dufault@hda.com Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, obrien@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h Message-ID: <199702231308.FAA02212@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <199702222141.QAA00382@hda.hda.com> (message from Peter Dufault on Sat, 22 Feb 1997 16:41:44 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > > Add _BSD4_4 as a predefined symbol. * > What ever came out of this discussion? 2.2 candidate, or dead end? I happen to like this one. Wasn't it suggested by POSIX? * This doesn't go in gcc. It goes nowhere or in <unistd.h>. I'd put * it in <unistd.h> and recommend it as the "this is a POSIXised modern BSD" * test macro. If it's safe to "#include <unistd.>" without chicken-and-egging ourselves again, that's fine for me too. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702231308.FAA02212>