Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:10:59 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lnc if_lnc.c Message-ID: <20030724160423.L3020@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200307231715.31186.wes@softweyr.com> References: <10036.1058870835@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030722235600.X8165@gamplex.bde.org> <200307231715.31186.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Wes Peters wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 07:17, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Several places, including if_lnc.c, used __inline to get cleaner code > > at no cost in performance. Removing __inline adds a tiny cost. > > Not if the compiler didn't actually *do* the inline, right? Removing the inline gives the same tiny cost as not doing it, except it costs more in bogusness points (since the bogusness is in the source code instead of in the compiler). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030724160423.L3020>