Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:36:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Robert Withrow <bwithrow@BayNetworks.COM> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Minor problems with upcomming 2.2.5 Message-ID: <199709221836.MAA01760@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199709221830.OAA21976@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com> References: <199709190520.XAA16476@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199709221830.OAA21976@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Robert Withrow writes: > > nate@mt.sri.com said: > :- Actually, I think having more process slots is *a good thing* > :- nowadays. Even on my (now ailing) lowly single-user 486/66 box with > :- 16MB, I bump up maxusers. > > How many more? If you suggest a number I could try it and see > if it fixes my problem, and then we'd at least have a datapoint > in the argument for raising the number in GENERIC... I don't have the box handy (the disk is dying on it, and it's at home), but you could try 16 to see if it helps. Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709221836.MAA01760>