Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:18:13 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bullshit! Mac OS X is not FreeBSD. Get real please. Message-ID: <20010725121813.B24103@technokratis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250014240.20007-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu>; from sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:36:06AM -0400 References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250014240.20007-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Go away, go away, go away, go away, go away! You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, and risk mis-informing people who read the list in hopes of actually learning something. Congratulations, though, you've earned a spot in my killfile. On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:36:06AM -0400, Sung Nae Cho wrote: > Okay, don't give me crap like I'm troll or anything stupid for I'm FreeBSD > user. But, I think there is a double standards in BSD community. First > of all, MAC OS X is not FreeBSD. How can it be a FreeBSD if it has > totally different core except that it has a FreeBSD user land commands? > Or, have I heard this wrong? 2nd, I personally don't see the difference > between APPLE and MICROSOFT. At least Microsoft doesn't pretend to be > friends with Open Sourced Community. APPLE is bullshit company. It > builds an OS based on Open Source and they're making it a proprietary. > That's bullshit! 3rd, OS X is a one crappy OS I've ever seen! Infact, > most APPLE users have gone back to OS 9 because OS X requires them to buy > all the softwares (Office suites...etc) built for OS X since the emulation > is terrible and utterally useless (TOO DAMN SLOW!). Go away. > It's also bullshit that FreeBSD community cannot throw away it's pride and > accept the defeat and try to learn from it. We all heard that in recent > benchmark, both Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 kick FreeBSD butt in > performance. FreeBSDers complained so they did the test again with all > the optimizations enabled and FreeBSD still couldn't beat both Windows > 2000 and Linux 2.4 (not to mention, Linux 2.4 and Win 2000 didn't even > receive special treat for getting tuned.) Come one people! Let's cut the > bull shit and get real. I'm sick of this idiots just saying this and that > without actually contributing anything to FreeBSD development. I hope > FreeBSD 5.x does a milestone just like Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 did. > Also, don't give me the crap like Windows 2000 and Linux are unstable! > I've tried em and Windows 2000 is a totally different beast than any > previous Windows (2000 is stable as a rock!). So is Linux. Linux 2.4 is > even stabler! Go away. > Why then do I use FreeBSD? I use FreeBSD not because it's better than > Linux or Windows 2000, not because it has better hardware support than > Linux or Windows, but just because I like the consistent layout of the > file structures. Redhat seems to move around files on every release. > Also, ports collections seem to be handy when I'm not in mood to compile > manually (not that I can't do it in Linux). I wish FreeBSD 5.x finally > get support for my new Kensington USB (OPTICAL) mouse on my Laptop! I > don't know about FreeBSD hardware support on desktops, but laptop hardware > support is simply not impressive! I'm not about to go back to wheel based mouse > (got tired of cleaning wheels). > > I hope this doesn't offend anyone. (Just got tired of listening to crap!) Go away. > Sung N. Cho Go away, -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@technokratis.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010725121813.B24103>