Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:55:43 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpa Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libassuan Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/security/opensc Makefile Message-ID: <AANLkTikwLkHJTTG6SDutgQ-tK_mzeAZ9OmN%2BpRF=jUaE@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D139A36.1080208@FreeBSD.org> References: <201012221916.oBMJGCMY069579@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTik7O8aB-4ehj21NsSc0w6TAjm%2BLP4a5LOkEOqoY@mail.gmail.com> <4D139A36.1080208@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 12/23/2010 10:41, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> Whoa, it's strange for 2.0.0 to 2.0.1. There is no ABI change from >> what I can tell, right? I am pretty sure about that if you do my >> suggest like in other thread and it will bring back to .so.0. > > On a philosophical basis I don't think it's a good idea to make gratuitous > changes to vendor's stuff, even if arguably their own change was gratuitous. On Linux, it's still .so.0 while on FreeBSD changed to .so.1. The shared library version should be never change when there is no ABI change. Check for more details that I just have sent to ports@ under 'libksba update broken' thread. Cheers, Mezz > Doug > > -- > > Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. > -- OK Go > > Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. > Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikwLkHJTTG6SDutgQ-tK_mzeAZ9OmN%2BpRF=jUaE>