Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:49:13 +0900 From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: imp@village.org Cc: winter@jurai.net, iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FIXED --> Thanks! Re: ep0 eeprom failed to come ready... Message-ID: <200003261249.VAA05285@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 25 Mar 2000 18:12:07 -0700" <200003260112.SAA76635@harmony.village.org> References: <200003260112.SAA76635@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003251939390.50194-100000@sasami.jurai.net> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: > : Ah. So what we really want is some mechanism to tell the kernel 'hey, > : you! don't use this ioport/irq whatever.' (or otherwise mark some > : resources as not being available to PnP devices.) > > I think that a null driver could easily be written. > > I also think that combined with the hint mechanism I posted to new-bus > a couple of days ago this could be a viable way to reserve interrupts > from the boot loader. That would be good. I'm also having similer idea that loading kernel loadable module for legacy non-PnP devices specifying thier resources, like; load pcm load sbc port 0x220 irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 Or, null driver module maybe just enough to hold resources; load resourceholder port 0x220 irq 5 drq 1 load resourceholder port drq 5 # BTW, it seems that the discussion is away from ep driver and -stable already :) # Should we move to somewhere? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003261249.VAA05285>