Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 00:28:42 +0100 From: Mark Huizer <xaa@stack.nl> To: Peter Korsten <peter@grendel.IAEhv.nl> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uptime Message-ID: <19970303002842.15745@xaa.stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970302125715.peter@grendel.>; from Peter Korsten on Sun, Mar 02, 1997 at 12:57:15PM %2B0100 References: <199702271713.JAA23356@ref.tfs.com> <Mutt.19970302125715.peter@grendel.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 02, 1997 at 12:57:15PM +0100, Peter Korsten wrote: > Julian Elischer shared with us: > > > > unfortunatly not actually FreeBSD, but a BSD43/MACH combination system > > (but running a lot of the same code) > > > > 10:36am up 500 days, 13:08, 2 users, load average: 0.20, 0.03, 0.02 > > The computerclub of the university in Eindhoven had a SysV release 2 > machine that was up for over 512 days. At one time, uptime had to be > patched because it used a too small datatype for the number of days. > Then they had to move, the machine had to go down, and when switched > on, one disk didn't work anymore. > > Just to think that I made a good start porting tcsh. > Good thing... what machine was that? I remember gem and its 400 days of uptime :-) Mark (eeh... also from that computerclub :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970303002842.15745>