Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:14:59 -0500 From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" <llwang@infor.org> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures Message-ID: <CAAMzD71_Xtvi-jv79qKYaCyAtVaej0DhN7A7B84WWCpZf=n6KA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <CAAMzD71D%2B%2Bq_XjuCe=is2SAsW843_TNYmxaFOcjM4-%2BQ-jRrzg@mail.gmail.com> <4ea55387.DnwwF%2BhvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <CAAMzD73=mQPv-FUa7ZBsFWntmK=RkVNide8pGUq8EzCa7Ln1qQ@mail.gmail.com> <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:30 AM, <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote: > "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" <llwang@infor.org> wrote: >> ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit >> structures even in 32-bit jails. > > That is arguably a bug in the jail support :( I think the only difference as a i386 jail is that the libraries are built 32bit, and setting of certain environment variables to tell uname to return i386, and possibly some make variables in make.conf to specify the CPUTYPE or ARCH. These won't affect how the 64bit kernel acts---you are still using the same kernel. -- llwang
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAMzD71_Xtvi-jv79qKYaCyAtVaej0DhN7A7B84WWCpZf=n6KA>