Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:05:38 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: attila! <attila@hun.org> Cc: "FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT" <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <20020925030538.GA22443@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020925000645.C1nI14141@hun.org> References: <20020924210822.GA61277@nagual.pp.ru> <200209242059.NAA26625@windsor.research.att.com> <200209242043.NAA26380@windsor.research.att.com> <20020924205250.GC60957@nagual.pp.ru> <200209242059.NAA26625@windsor.research.att.com> <20020925000645.C1nI14141@hun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:06:45AM +0000, attila! wrote: > > However, I do object to GNU's heavy handed removal of a > flag which is in extensive use. I don't have a problem > with the new syntax, but leave the old one intact > > -k, --key=POS1[,POS2] > start a key at POS1, end it at POS 2 > GNU's heavy handed removal? According to Bill Fenner the removal is mandated by POSIX. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020925030538.GA22443>