Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:26:39 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/gx if_gx.c if_gxreg.h if_gxvar.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111151525530.72203-100000@beppo> In-Reply-To: <20011115084047.A1917@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No, if gx is backported, it replaces wx. There's ample precedent for this. Leaving it in place for a bit is a good thing, but prior to the next 4.X release wx certainly goes away. On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 08:26:39PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Jonathon- do me a favor- after a week or so, would you gc wx in -stable too? > > So we don't break people's kernels on their next CVSup; we should > probably just leave wx in RELENG_4. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111151525530.72203-100000>