Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:39:35 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611021337530.13428@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020824150.12236@sea.ntplx.net> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: >> >> I agree with the last part, but I think we need to bump sooner rather >> than later because we need to support binary only applications compiled >> against 6.x (remember, we're not really supporting anything else so >> smart vendors are going to build against it). >> > Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > "to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > is turned on by default. Actually, remember that this is -current so we only need to bump them once. Symbol versioning could be turned on later, but... > I think more important would be to know > the plans regarding the symbol versioning in 7.0-RELEASE; if the > plan is to have them versioned, then I think we should sync shlib > majors bumping with this change. I agree that we should do this at the same time. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0611021337530.13428>