Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:24:52 +0300 From: "toxa" <postfix@sendmail.ru> To: "Artem Ignatiev" <timon@memphis.mephi.ru>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken top stats Message-ID: <001c01c409d8$80450790$0202a8c0@karputer> References: <1079276960.918.14.camel@timon.nist> <xzp8yi3zc7d.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
so would you mind to tell me any quite reliable tool for it? :) Artem Ignatiev <timon@memphis.mephi.ru> writes: > I've noticed that top now is now unreliable in measuring system > performance. top has never been and will never be a reliable tool for system performance measurement. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001c01c409d8$80450790$0202a8c0>