Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:41:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c Message-ID: <200304101941.MAA90484@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c kern_proc.c kern_thread.c sched_4bsd.c sched_ule.c subr_smp.c subr_witness.c src/sys/ In-Reply-To: <20030410151504.R37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101241380.90002-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On 10-Apr-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > julian 2003/04/10 10:35:45 PDT > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > sys/ddb db_ps.c > > > sys/i386/i386 genassym.c > > > sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c > > > kern_proc.c kern_thread.c sched_4bsd.c > > > sched_ule.c subr_smp.c subr_witness.c > > > sys/sys proc.h > > > Log: > > > Move the _oncpu entry from the KSE to the thread. > > > The entry in the KSE still exists but it's purpose will change a bit > > > when we add the ability to lock a KSE to a cpu. > > > > Why not add a ke_pincpu to hold the bound CPU? Since KSE's are in > > theory a kind of virtual CPU abstraction the thread really seems to > > be the wrong place for this information. > > > > Er, this seems wrong to me. Regardless, please but the bound cpu > information in the scheduler specific data. I already have an entry for > it in ULE. There is no bound CPU data yet. > > Cheers, > Jeff > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304101941.MAA90484>