Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:19:31 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r269847 - in stable/10: contrib/apr contrib/apr/docs contrib/apr/encoding contrib/apr/file_io/unix contrib/apr/include contrib/apr/include/arch/unix contrib/apr/include/private contrib/...
Message-ID:  <201408121119.32037.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <53e9707c.2d6c.2d976b@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <53e9707c.2d6c.2d976b@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, August 11, 2014 9:40:12 pm Peter Wemm wrote:
> Author: peter
> Date: Tue Aug 12 01:40:11 2014
> New Revision: 269847
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269847
> 
> Log:
>   MFC r266728,266731,266735,266736,268135,268960,269833
>    Update apr 1.4.8 -> 1.5.1
>    Update apr-util 1.5.2 -> 1.5.3
>    Update serf 1.3.4 -> 1.3.7
>    Update svnlite 1.8.8 -> 1.8.10
>    Deal with svnlite.1 manpage.

Isn't this merge a little quick?  1.8.10 only went into head about 6 hours 
before this commit.  The 1.8.8 merge to 10 was also rather quick (less than an 
hour after it was merged to HEAD).  If the security issues noted in the commit 
for HEAD are severe enough to warrant an immediate merge, then there should 
probably be an advisory.  Otherwise, I think svn updates should probably have 
some bake time in HEAD before going to stable.

(As an aside, I didn't get a commit mail for 269833 for some reason)

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201408121119.32037.jhb>