Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:25:27 -0700
From:      bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah)
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah), Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 19788 for review 
Message-ID:  <200210221525.g9MFPS6e032073@intruder.bmah.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021022105757.jhb@FreeBSD.org> 
References:  <XFMail.20021022105757.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote:

> That still doesn't work actually.  kan@ is working on fixing rtld-elf
> to not die with only 1 PT_LOAD segment (which is valid), but it seems
> to maybe be a gcc bug.  groff built w/o optimization fails with ENOMEM.
> groff built with cpu optimizations works ok.  See thread in -current.

Thanks.  That's what I get for writing emails before reading everything
first.  :-)

Bruce.



[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506

iD8DBQE9tW3n2MoxcVugUsMRAtqnAJ9H9/AbDxdkvqTTpFLvJCKHOoBxbACfYeSe
+lmtAhu2NSL6+0u6xfGtoLo=
=xXpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210221525.g9MFPS6e032073>