Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:03:04 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution Message-ID: <199901270603.WAA09222@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <199901270151.RAA64117@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi Asami at "Jan 26, 1999 5:51:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Well, actually I did f2c as a port, and it does indeed fit > * inside the ports paradigm. Please, see my original email in > * the thread. > > Yes, I know that. I was just wondering why people would want it > otherwise. > My original email provided an opportunity to revisit the sendmail versus postfix controversy. That is, some software seems to fall short of support for inclusion in the base distribution but it may be too important for ports. Maybe the package system that I seen discussed will obviate the controversy. -- Steve finger kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~clesceri/kargl.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901270603.WAA09222>