Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 09:24:07 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: jdp@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp checksum MFS requerst Message-ID: <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020802134108.P86866-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20020802134108.P86866-100000@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1520295196P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > do you object of MFSing jdp's fix from 1 Jul 2002 to > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17.2.3 +15 -10 src/sys/i386/i386/in_cksum.c > 1.7.2.2 +15 -12 src/sys/i386/include/in_cksum.h > > into RELENG_4_6 ? So as I understand this change, it just allows these files to be built with higher optimization levels, but without changing functionality in any way. I'm somewhat opposed to merging this fix to RELENG_4_6, as it doesn't seem to be anywhere near the same magnitude as the commits that have gone into RELENG_4_6. The other changes are fixes for security advisories or fairly major regressions of functionality (such as the ata(4) driver fixes). I think it'd be a nice fix to have, but if we merged in every "nice to have" change, we'd basically end up with a new, full release. That release (4.7) isn't due out for another couple of months. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1520295196P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9SrIm2MoxcVugUsMRAsnVAKDe5tU+MLs18h8jbXgngzt5j4blXACeIlsR rlxZRD6F4CDfP+ll+f4GodY= =fpr5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1520295196P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208021624.g72GO7q1012279>