Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:43:17 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support Message-ID: <200612221343.21237.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200612220259.kBM2xYxc019408@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> References: <000801c723bb$efc2b540$260ba8c0@wii.wintecind.com> <20061221095811.886d9850.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200612220259.kBM2xYxc019408@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Friday, 22. December 2006 03:59, Garrett Wollman wrote: > spork@bway.net writes: > >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never > >was. > > Why do people continue to say this? Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. Just like .0 and .1 releases are rushed out the door after a few months of mad hackfest and patches being rushed back and forth on kernel.org. Smirk. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFi9LpXhc68WspdLARAjOfAJ9jJB3Nltu0bVuyLAjkEjnj2pViPQCfc32v VnnsZ//cpOjuBFsRNcrCvKk= =PeJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612221343.21237.lofi>