Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:55:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 129965] [patch] ps(1): ps -lH doesn't show the proper CPU# Message-ID: <bug-129965-227-YvaIC7EMAl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-129965-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-129965-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D129965 Piotr Pawel Stefaniak <pstef@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pstef@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Piotr Pawel Stefaniak <pstef@freebsd.org> --- I don't think that the patch is correct. My main disagreement with it is the replacing of ki_estcpu with ki_lastcpu, which would render a part of the ma= nual page definitely incorrect. It seems to me that the intention of the keyword "cpu" really is "short-term CPU usage factor (for scheduling)" as the manual page puts it. I believe th= at it isn't meant to show the CPU on which the process is running. Therefore, I think, the way forward is to add another keyword to do what you expected of the keyword "cpu". My patch calls it "cpu#" and is currently un= der review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25377 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-129965-227-YvaIC7EMAl>