Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:45:37 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Valery V.Chikalov" <valera@novakom.dp.ua> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 stability Message-ID: <p06002001bbb3375f21ba@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20031015062858.GA52389@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <97CFE7EC2D15B746BB4EE7DEC8126BB4016AB864@sydexgmb01.org.geac.com> <3F8CDC81.6010207@novakom.dp.ua> <20031015062858.GA52389@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:28 PM -0700 10/14/03, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Valery V.Chikalov wrote: > >> >10:21AM up 101 days, 17:12, 1 user, load averages: 0.33, 0.58, 0.44 > >> valera@don$ uptime >> 8:22 up 112 days, 17:14, 1 user, load averages: 1,34 1,69 1,72 > >I can beat both of you :-) > >11:07PM up 147 days, 48 mins, 0 users, load averages: 2.29, 2.29, 2.24 > >That's a sparc64 in the bento package build cluster. I hate to rain on this parade, but that only tells us how reliable 5.x was 147 days ago. 5.x remains in a state of flux, and there have been many times in the last 147 days where you could cvsup into a very unstable system. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002001bbb3375f21ba>