Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:09:06 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient. Message-ID: <20060418220906.GF8675@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> References: <200604181900.k3IJ0rUC075126@freefall.freebsd.org> <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:40:31PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > Synopsis: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient.
> >=20
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: maxim
> > State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 18 19:00:15 UTC 2006
> > State-Changed-Why:=20
> > Committed to HEAD. Thanks you both!
>=20
> My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the state of
> the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when the fix is MFC'=
ed,
> is that no longer the case, or is my understanding wrong?
That's the recommendation in the PR handling guidelines, but that's
pretty much a rule of thumb rather than a requirement. I prefer to do
it this way, rather than rely on spelling "MFC After" properly, but to
each their own.
Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
--YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFERWOCocfcwTS3JF8RAtDLAKC3cN0Tb+KPAsN2dwxvaOzZ+IfDgACgumAU
mqxcqimGrkZzcO9QrlcebWo=
=e58l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060418220906.GF8675>