Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:06:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution Message-ID: <19990126220644.A7037@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199901270555.VAA09197@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>; from Steve Kargl on Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 09:55:03PM -0800 References: <199901270504.WAA18271@mt.sri.com> <199901270555.VAA09197@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The question is whether Peter wants to include g77, and whether > people would see this as bloat. I know g77 outperforms f2c+gcc > on my real-world benchmarks by a significant margin. A good question, is how easy it is to download egcs-g77-1.1.1.tar.gz and build it into something workable assuming the EGCS C and C++ compilers are part of the system. I've got a Bmaked contribified version of EGCS, but didn't do g77. So maybe a consensus should be made what to do about FORTRAN in the base system. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990126220644.A7037>