Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
To:        Studded <Studded@gorean.org>
Cc:        junkmale@xtra.co.nz, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: default rules in rc.firewall cause problem
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9810221201440.6098-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
In-Reply-To: <362F7BB1.71A13EF3@gorean.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Studded wrote:

> 	This is about the 8th time I've seen this post of yours. You are
> missing several important aspects of this situation. First off, the
> outside interface should NEVER see traffic from RFC 1918 space, so if
> you have to modify this rule to get your system to work then your system
> is screwed. 

True for -current, but not for -stable.  In -stable (as of 19980828), when
a packet goes through natd, it gets reinjected at the start of the rules
again, so all of a sudden, the ipfw rules are seeing a packet from the
outside with a destination within RFC 1918 space.

Three solutions that I know of: 1) delete the rule 2) one that I'm working
on, involving diverting to other interfaces, or 3) upgrade to -current,
which by default puts the packet back in the queue so that it picks up
with the next rule after the divert.

I find #1 extremely distasteful, which is why I'm working on #2.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9810221201440.6098-100000>