Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:59:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Nathan Whitehorn <nathanw@uchicago.edu> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun Fire servers.... Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0606131059230.18486@harper.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060613154854.GA9037@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <1A384146-1D91-498F-A96D-538A1056AACB@ocsny.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.0606122304170.3840@harper.uchicago.edu> <20060613154854.GA9037@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No, 2 GB. It should be fine, but the drives get out of sync with one another and that confuses things badly. -Nathan On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:05:20PM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> I'm running 6.1-STABLE on one. Works beautifully. Avoid the SATA RAID. >> It's terrible, and causes fs corruption. And you'll need to update to > > Is this with more tha 4GB of RAM? There was a SATA bug that should be > fixed in 6.1-STABLE (but maybe not). > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.62.0606131059230.18486>