Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:16:16 +0800 From: "Mars G Miro" <spry@anarchy.in.the.ph> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: igb on a Nehalem system, buildworld stats Message-ID: <f12f408a0901081116v666ef917x75fb898e1edcb13f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0901081106k5dbaeef8s788d2460820c75cd@mail.gmail.com> References: <f12f408a0901080616t78dded81l979a4ec06de7739f@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0901080844y1c2ad632t12aeadfbe9f34d0a@mail.gmail.com> <f12f408a0901081019x2ea4e83i47851fa3ed2a0ae4@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0901081033h7db7a1aej8399baf5dcbd270f@mail.gmail.com> <f12f408a0901081050p1a8154c5h19035f399944b3fc@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0901081106k5dbaeef8s788d2460820c75cd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > So it wasn't identified during install but was in the kernel you built > afterward, is that > what you're saying? Even if that's true I don't think its relevant to the > failure. > Ahm no, sysinstall said something like: igb0: <unknown network interface type> igb1: <unknown network interface type> but we just went ahead and made the choice. I thought it might be a slight variation of igb NICs or something so I stated that info. > I have made a couple queries internally, there are a lot of variations on > Nehalem > systems, at least one other engineer in my group had an encounter with one > like yours, I have two managers looking for me, hopefully I can find one. > Ok cool. Matsalams (means much thanks!) ;-) > Jack > > [snip] -- cheers mars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f12f408a0901081116v666ef917x75fb898e1edcb13f>