Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:56:51 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r199067 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 Message-ID: <20091111215651.GM64905@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <7meio5g4yx.wl%kuriyama@s2factory.co.jp> References: <7meio5g4yx.wl%kuriyama@s2factory.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XLsjFikA86nwwlhe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, * Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Can you test with these patches? Testing on only one of both system > is enough. "patch-1" forces disabling CLFLUSH feature even if SS bit > exists. "patch-2" forces no CLFLUSH tweak. I'd like to know with > which patch your system can live. For some reason they both seem to boot. Yikes. I've done some more testing and it seems the old version even hangs if I add some additional printf's above and below, which makes me believe the problem is a bit more complex than we realize... --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --XLsjFikA86nwwlhe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkr7MyMACgkQ52SDGA2eCwX+0QCfZWieNhaeOSSXR4KVr1RUevAi Hw0An3se8TacEY19/Uu/cHQkDV0DPmoF =S41m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XLsjFikA86nwwlhe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091111215651.GM64905>