Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:12:56 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@linux.gr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make vs. gmake in 6-CURRENT... Message-ID: <41C20868.7060702@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20041216134701.GA44809@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41C10C99.10600@mac.com> <20041216134701.GA44809@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: [ ... ] > Revision 1.16 of the port Makefile doesn't build a growisofs executable. It doesn't? Ah, thank you, I see: [ ... ] c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-exceptions -c -o growisofs_mmc.o growisofs_mmc.cpp cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -c -o growisofs.o growisofs.c c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-exceptions -c -o dvd+rw-format.o dvd+rw-format.cpp ...under 6, versus this under 4.10: c++ -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -c -o growisofs_mmc.o growisofs_mmc.cpp cc -O -pipe -c -o growisofs.o growisofs.c c++ -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -o growisofs growisofs_mmc.o growisofs.o -lcam c++ -O -pipe -fno-exceptions -c -o dvd+rw-format.o dvd+rw-format.cpp OK. > If we don't have the ability to reorganize things within the distfile > (because, e.g. the creator of dvd+rw-tools distfile does not target just > FreeBSD), using gmake seems to be the way to go. I don't have an objection to depending on gmake, but I would prefer not to add dependencies which are not really necessary. In other words, I'd still like to know what changed in make from FreeBSD-4 & 5 to 6. :-) As to the author, he's been reasonably responsive to adding an env variable or two to facilitate FreeBSD port preferences (such as not installing setuid by default) and to using ?= rather than = in defining CC and such. The port's primary audience is Linux, but FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD, Solaris, etc, are all recognized as supported platforms. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41C20868.7060702>