Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:12:37 +0300
From:      Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr>
To:        mchauber@gmx.net
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Sadly, my tinker-time has run out....
Message-ID:  <46DA9AA5.8030904@otenet.gr>
In-Reply-To: <200709020222.21000.mchauber@gmx.net>
References:  <200709020222.21000.mchauber@gmx.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail



Michael Hauber wrote:
> Hey, all...
>
> I've been a user of FreeBSD and OpenBSD for quite a while now.  Unfortunatly, 
> I haven't had much time to tinker lately, and that's unlikely to change in 
> the near future.  Sadly, I need to get an OS that my wife would be more 
> comfortable using and that wouldn't be as time-comsuming to make it more 
> comfortable for her.  
>
> I downloaded the uberyl live CD and found that ubuntu seems to pick up on 
> everything I have on the laptop (as well as all the attachments), so I'm 
> downloading it now.
>
> Because I've put so much time into getting this FreeBSD install where it is 
> now (and because I favor the BSDs), I'm still a bit hesitant...  Has anyone 
> here had much experience with ubunu as a desktop?  Negatives/positives?
>
> Kind of OT, I guess...  I'd just rather hear it from someone in this group 
> rather than the inevitable, "Oh yeah.  You won't be sorry." from the ubuntu 
> folk (salespitches == fingernails on a chalkboard :) ).  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
> PS.  Yes, I've played with PC-BSD.  Unfortunately, that's still more work than 
> I have time for.
>   
I am working (and tinkering as you put it) with many kinds of systems:
Fedora / Ubuntu as desktops, Debian as servers, FreeBSD both desktops
and servers, Windows 2003 servers, XP desktops, even Vista :)
To put it simply, every system has its strong points, ups and downs. For
example, Windows has drivers for everything - many are crap, but they
still exist - and a few applications you just can't replace with
anything else. Ubuntu, the one you are considering, is based on Debian,
which I consider excellent, especially for servers. But if you are
coming from a FreeBSD background, Ubuntu will seem rather "restrictive"
and "easy". It is an easy desktop for *NIX beginners, and it is now
marketed as the Linux you will never have to touch the command line. As
I recall, the default install will not even setup gcc, although the
package (build-essential) is on CD. There are obviously a lot of helper
apps, like automatic installation of codecs etc. but it is still Linux.
If you are a power user you will need to tinker it, and there will be
things missing you will need to install. Example: First time I tried to
mount some NFS shares, they were taking ages. I found out it was missing
the nfs-common package. Maybe a beginner does not care about it, but I
consider this basic functionality and expect it to be there (or that I
will be informed it is not, beforehand). I also need the compiler,
kernel headers and stuff to compile kernel modules. Ubuntu seems to have
a lot of ready made things, good for beginners but quite limiting for
me, I have to actually rip things out to install my stuff (e.g. disable
their versions of some restricted drivers to install mine). That being
said, it is making an alternate, non-Windows desktop accessible to a lot
of people, which I consider a good thing.
Though I suggest Ubuntu to enthusiastic Linux beginners, I find it
difficult to give an argument for anyone with an average FreeBSD
knowledge. At home I mostly use Fedora as a Linux desktop.

The part of your post I don't really understand, is what is really
bothering you with your FreeBSD install. Are you missing programs /
features you just can't live without?  Is it something to do with the
ports / packages? Installing, customizing and becoming familiar with
your FreeBSD system does take some time, but this is followed by a very
long effortless stable operation. Assuming a typical installation where
users' needs don't constantly change, you can easily maintain a FreeBSD
install with minimum hassle. And how is Ubuntu going to be any easier
for your wife? Assuming you are administering the machine, a FreeBSD
with  a Gnome  desktop will be more or less the same from the user
standpoint to Ubuntu (or any other distro) with Gnome.







help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46DA9AA5.8030904>