Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:01:43 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, Hellmuth Michaelis <hm@hellmuth-michaelis.de> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec Message-ID: <5A119CD7.2020905@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <20171119144450.GD82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <b96b449e-3dc1-6e75-e803-e6d6abefe88e@spam-fetish.org> <20171119120832.GA82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <07003E8F-6EF8-4D4B-8C0C-319F81AD2A73@hellmuth-michaelis.de> <20171119144450.GD82727@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.11.2017 21:44, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2409 >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7296 > > I don't doubt there being RFCs, but there are also some incompatible > vendor extensions. E.g. racoon announces Kerberos authentication > support (which is presently broken) etc. racoon does not announce Kerberos authentication support in my case. May be due to the fact I build security/ipsec-tools port with disabled option for GSSAPI Security API support.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A119CD7.2020905>