Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 01:52:59 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: natd and static nat for different subnets Message-ID: <20020319015259.M60554@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <3C97043B.449715B2@svzserv.kemerovo.su>; from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:26:19PM %2B0700 References: <3C96CCDA.C54342F5@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20020318225141.I60554@blossom.cjclark.org> <3C96E940.95335672@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20020319011822.K60554@blossom.cjclark.org> <3C97043B.449715B2@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:26:19PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> > > Would it be hard to implement this?
> >
> > Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality
> > though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different
> > internal networks to different external addresses except maybe some
> > warm fuzzies.
>
> Consider small-to-medium ISP and consumer's networks with little demand
> of real IP addresses.
OK...
I considered them. I don't see what mapping different address blocks
to a different address gains you.
> > > Is it issue of natd itself or of libalias?
> > I think it's more of a libalias(3) issue.
>
> Thanks.
I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
option for you.
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020319015259.M60554>