Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: bmah@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp checksum MFS requerst Message-ID: <200208021628.g72GS8qL048171@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20020802134108.P86866-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org>, Bruce A. Mah <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > --==_Exmh_-1520295196P > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > If memory serves me right, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > > do you object of MFSing jdp's fix from 1 Jul 2002 to > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.17.2.3 +15 -10 src/sys/i386/i386/in_cksum.c > > 1.7.2.2 +15 -12 src/sys/i386/include/in_cksum.h > > > > into RELENG_4_6 ? > > So as I understand this change, it just allows these files to be built > with higher optimization levels, but without changing functionality in > any way. Exactly. > I'm somewhat opposed to merging this fix to RELENG_4_6, as it doesn't > seem to be anywhere near the same magnitude as the commits that have > gone into RELENG_4_6. The other changes are fixes for security > advisories or fairly major regressions of functionality (such as the > ata(4) driver fixes). > > I think it'd be a nice fix to have, but if we merged in every "nice to > have" change, we'd basically end up with a new, full release. That > release (4.7) isn't due out for another couple of months. I agree. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208021628.g72GS8qL048171>