Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 23:01:25 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH: type errors in src-tree Message-ID: <20030305070125.GC92645@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3E628ED4.9030203@liwing.de> References: <200303022056.h22KuDIg055497@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3E628ED4.9030203@liwing.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:08:04AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Now, that OpenWatcom is released, the FreeBSd port of it should follow. > And maybe someone will try to compile the kernel and world with it. I hate to be the skeptic, but looking at OpenWatcom 1.0, it only produces dos and win32 binaries. It will be a *long* time until it targets Unix correctly. > If that would work, this would be great, because the watcom compiler > generates much better code than gcc does, even than gcc -O3 (and all > known optimizations on). Rather than just repeat some old wife's tale; can anyone produce a real analysis backing this statement up? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305070125.GC92645>