Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 05:03:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: ken@kdm.org (Kenneth D. Merry) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sbufs in userland, proposed solution Message-ID: <200103140503.WAA03185@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20010313162840.A90872@panzer.kdm.org> from "Kenneth D. Merry" at Mar 13, 2001 04:28:40 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> libcam will be complied with a dependency on libsbuf, so libsbuf will > automatically get pulled in for applications that dynamically link with > libcam. [ ... ] > As for applications that link statically (e.g. camcontrol), they'll have to > add libsbuf to the link line in order to compile. > > There is apparantly no way around the static link problem, so this is > something that has to be done, unless I go with one of the other two > alternatives -- putting sbufs in libc or in libcam. The "library A depends on library B" approach is _supposed_ to work with both static and dynamic linking. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103140503.WAA03185>