Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:27:26 GMT From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 173935 for review Message-ID: <201001300127.o0U1RQGw050148@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=173935 Change 173935 by rwatson@rwatson_fledge on 2010/01/30 01:27:18 Remove several todo items that are todone. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/trustedbsd/capabilities/TODO#19 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/trustedbsd/capabilities/TODO#19 (text+ko) ==== @@ -13,16 +13,6 @@ user databases, libraries, etc, with a POSIX interface within the capability mode process. -- Get shared objects working in capability mode by creating a cap_ld-elf.so - that will take the binary to run as a file descriptor argument in order - to avoid needing to run the interpreter directly from the fexecve(2) - context. Consider carefully the implications on creating binaries, ELF, - etc. - -- Implement libcapability, a lightweight framework for starting code in a - capability mode sandbox using fexecve(2), etc, and providing a simple - local procedure call interface to compartmentalized services. - - ... bigger and better things ... Low-level TODO list: @@ -75,4 +65,5 @@ - Add support (a.k.a. find test platforms) for arm, ia64, etc. in lib/csu -- It would be nice if we didn't need -rdynamic; can we export just _capstart? Should we add more information (a capability entry point) to ELF? +- It would be nice if we didn't need -rdynamic; can we export just _capstart? + Should we add more information (a capability entry point) to ELF?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201001300127.o0U1RQGw050148>